Source: United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia
Date: 1836-03-01
Jurisdiction: United States
Citation: 4 Cranch 674 · 4 D.C. 674
Opinion
The Court (Thruston, J., absent,) was of opinion that the description of the things stolen was too vague, and quashed the indictment. A new indictment was found by the grand jury. [Post, 682.]