Source: United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia
Date: 1836-03-01
Jurisdiction: United States
Citation: 4 Cranch 681 · 4 D.C. 681
Opinion
The Court (MoRSell, J., absent, and Thruston, J., doubting,) told the jury that in law the goods stolen were the goods of the husband, and ought to have been so stated in the indictment. Verdict not guilty. The prisoner was remanded.