Source: United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Date: 1806-06-01
Jurisdiction: United States
Citation: 1 Cranch 314 · 1 D.C. 314
Opinion
Ca. sa. for costs on verdict at December term, 1805, for defendant, Tenny. On the 30th of September, 1805, Densley had been .discharged under the Insolvent Law of 1803, [2 Stat. at Large, 237,] by the 10th
section of which, he is to- be discharged if taken on any process or any judgment for any debt, damages, or costs contracted, owing or growing due before his discharge. Part of these costs were growing due or were contracted before his discharge. The defendant, Densley, was discharged by the Coukt on that ground. (Duckett, J., absent.)