STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ON THE RELATION OF JONATHAN B. LINDSAY vs. ENOCH L. STEPHENS & OTHERS, 3 Ired. 92

Daniel, J. The reasons given by the judge, who tried the cause in the Superior Court, are, in our opinion, correct, and we adopt them. He might have made his charge still stronger for the relator, as it appears that the constable had actually obtained judgments in the name of the relator on the twomotes. Why then did he not collect those judgments ? The judgment, we think, must be affirmed. Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.