Mr. Justice FisheR delivered the opinion of the court. The appellee -filed his bill in the • vice-chancery court ,at Natchez, to enjoin the appellant, as sheriff and tax collector of Adams county, from collecting a certain sum of money alleged by the said sheriff to be due from the appellee, for taxes assessed upon the amount of the sales of slaves, sold as merchandise, in the county of Adams, by the appellee.

The bill, after alleging that the complainant is a resident citizen of,the county of Adams, contains the following allegations, to wit, “ that he (the complainant) has a permanent depot near the city of Natchez, in said county, for the purpose of carrying on and transacting his business as a stationary, regular, and permanent vendor of slaves; and that he has not carried any such slaves from point to point, offering them for sale in this State.” The appellant filed a demurrer to the bill, which was,’in the court below, overruled ;■ and the ease is now before this court upon an appeal from thát decision.

In the case of James v. Elder, 23 Miss. R. 134, this court decided that there was, at the time of the commencement of the suit in that case, in 1848, no statute in force requiring the vendors of slaves to pay a tax on the amount of their sales. The only statute on the subject is the 16th

section of the act of 1850, in these words: “ That all vendors of slaves as merchandise, who shall carry the same from point to point within this State, offering the same for sale as such, shall be assessed with the sales thereof, as merchandise, sold by transient vendors, and such taxes shall be collected according to the laws now in force relative thereto.” Acts of 1850, 49. This language is too clear to admit of construction. The vendor of slaves as merchandise, to come within the operation of the law, must carry his slaves from point to point, offering them for sale.

It was not intended to embrace a trader or vendor who had a permanent place of making his sales, and who sold only at that place. The decree of the court below will be affirmed, and cause remanded.