AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee, v. Billy Carl STEPHENS and Rory Ross, Appellants, 982 S.W.2d 370

PER CURIAM. This case comes to us on a certified question from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

The question is “[wjhether it is against public policy for an insurer to limit coverage for a therapist’s non-sexual misconduct because sexual misconduct is alleged to have occurred in the same or related course of professional treatment, even though such sexual misconduct is immaterial to the non-sexual misconduct claims asserted.” After careful consideration of the question, we conclude that Judge Reavley correctly applied Texas law in his dissent to the panel opinion that was subsequently -withdrawn. For the reasons Judge Reavley explained, we answer the certified question no. . American Home Assurance Co. v.

Stephens, 140 F.3d 617, 618 (5th Cir.1998). . American Home Assurance Co. v. Stephens, 130 F.3d 123, 128-30 (5th Cir.1997)(Reavley, J., dissenting), withdrawn, 140 F.3d 617 (5th Cir.1998).