PARCO, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. PERO & DANIELS, Inc., Defendant, Appellee, 131 F.2d 864

PER CURIAM. A careful examination of the record in this case convinces us that the patent in suit is invalid for want of invention for the reasons stated in the opinion of the District Court. 45 F.Supp. 685. The judgment of the District Court is affirmed with costs to the appellee.