CLARKE-EMERSON MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Defendant, Appellant, v. REGAL SHOE COMPANY, Plaintiff, Appellee, 28 F.2d 1008

PER CURIAM. The only question raised by this appeal is whether the patentee was the inventor of the device, the subject-matter of the patent in suit. In the District Court it was found that he was, and we are of the opinion that the finding should not be disturbed. The decree of. the District Court is affirmed, with costs to the appeEee.