James RIFFIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Adam D. SNYDER; Michael V. Forlini; C. Robert Loskot; Paul M. Mayhew, Defendants-Appellees, 120 F. App'x 514

PER CURIAM. James Riffin appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Riffin v. Snyder, No. CA-04-2964-RDB (D.Md. Sept. 17, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED