Paul M. OMAR, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Joseph M. BROOKS, Warden; Carolyn D. Dunson, Case Manager; K.M. White, Regional Director; Harrell Watts; Harris Lappin, Defendants-Appellees, 120 F. App'x 517

PER CURIAM. Paul M. Omar appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Omar v. Brooks, No. CA-04-248 (E.D.Va. Aug. 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED