Antonio V. POWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Augustus KING, Lieutenant; Clarence, Sergeant; Collin Whitaker, Correctional Officer; Karl Council, Correctional Officer; Larry Higgs, Correctional Officer; Rachel Reynolds, Nurse; Ollie Matthews, Nurse; Donna Brown, Nurse; John Grimes, Nurse, Defendants-Appellees, 128 F. App'x 315

PER CURIAM: Antonio V. Powell appeals the district court’s order granting

summary judgment to Defendants and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint in which he alleged deliberate indifference to his medical needs. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Powell v. King, No. CA-03-102-H (E.D.N.C. Aug. 11, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED