PER CURIAM. Felicia Hamlett, a federal inmate, appeals the district court’s denial of Ham-lett’s request for free copies of an investigation report and lab report transcripts. We affirm the district court’s denial of the request. Copies of transcripts may be provided to an indigent litigant at government expense upon a showing by the litigant of a particularized need for the documents. See Jones v. Superintendent, Virginia State Farm, 460 F.2d 150, 152-53 (4th Cir.1972), cert. denied, 410 U.S. 944, 98 S.Ct. 1380, 35 L.Ed.2d 611 (1973).
An indigent is not entitled to free copies “merely to comb the record in the hope of discovering some flaw.” United States v. Glass, 317 F.2d 200, 202 (4th Cir.1963). Hamlett’s request for copies of the report and transcripts does not establish the requisite need under Jones. The Rules Governing
Section 2255 Proceedings require only that the facts in support of a claim for relief be set forth in
summary form. Rule 2(b). Discovery may thereafter be available in the 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) proceeding. Rule 6. As Hamlett has failed to establish why she cannot, without copies of the transcripts, set forth in
summary form the facts in support of her claim, we affirm the district courts’ denial of her request. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED