James Allen BOYLES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Scott LITTLE, Defendant-Appellee, 131 F. App'x 432

PER CURIAM: James Allen Boyles appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Boyles’ motions to appoint counsel and for preparation of a transcript at government expense, and we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Boyles v. Little, No. CA-04-91-5 (N.D.W.Va. Jan. 21, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED