Elizabeth Mason FROTHINGHAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donald H. RUMSFELD, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States of America; Carl W.S. Chun, in his official capacity as Director of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records for the United States Army; Peter Schoomaker, in his official capacity as Chief of Staff for the United States Army; Les Brownlee, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary for the United States Army; Thomas J. Romig, in his official capacity as Judge Advocate for the United States Army; Steven Morello, in his official capacity as General Counsel for the United States Army; Paul T. Mikolashek, in his official capacity as Inspector General for the United States Army, Defendants-Appellees, 131 F. App'x 935

PER CURIAM: Dr. Elizabeth Frothingham appeals the district court’s order granting defendants’ motion to dismiss and motion for

summary judgment in her civil action in which she alleged constitutional violations and violations of the Administrative Procedure Act in the denial of her claim for benefits under a military pension survivor benefit annuity. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Frothingham v. Rumsfeld, No. CA-04-82-1 (E.D.Va. Nov. 18, 2004). We also deny Frothingham’s motion for oral argument. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED