UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roderick Emmanuel STEADMAN, Defendant-Appellant, 133 F. App'x 891

PER CURIAM: Roderick Emmanuel Steadman appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to compel the Government to move for a downward departure based on substantial assistance pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Steadman, No. CR-00-248 (E.D.Va. Nov. 16, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED To the extent that Steadman attempts to raise issues in his informal brief that were not properly presented to the district court, we note that he cannot raise them for the first time on appeal. See Muth v. United States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir.1993).