James Edward LOWE, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Doctor SHAH, Medical Officer; Doctor Guzman, Medical Officer; Doctor Allen, Clinical Director; Pa/Mlp Yirga, Physician Assistant; Pa/Mlp Hilletework, Physician Assistant; Pa/Mlp Osorio, Physician Assistant; Doctor Bhuller, Defendants-Appellees; and James M. Brooks, Warden; Harley Lap-pin, Regional Director Mid-Atlantic Region; Kathleen Hawk-Sawyer, Director, Defendants, v. United States of America, Party in Interest, 137 F. App'x 608

PER CURIAM. James Edward Lowe, III, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on.his Bivens complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Lowe v. Shah, No. CA-03-1423-1 (E.D.Va. Mar. 4, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971).