Ervin L. HUDSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bernard ADAMS, Officer, Defendant-Appellee, 139 F. App'x 567

PER CURIAM: Ervin L. Hudson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hudson v. Adams, No. CA-04-521-3 (E.D.Va. Feb. 17, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED