UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Larnell ECKLES, Jr., Defendant-Appellant, 142 F. App'x 190

PER CURIAM: William Larnell Eckles, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Eckles has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED