Kevin POTTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY; Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Intervenors/Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Marguerite C. Potter; Harry H. Potter, Defendants-Appellants, 170 F. App'x 272

PER CURIAM: Kevin Potter, Marguerite C. Potter, and Harry H. Potter appeal the district court’s final order granting Defendants’ motion for

summary judgment and district court orders dated May 15, 2000, Nov. 28, 2000, Mar. 29, 2001, Aug. 22, 2001, Oct. 23, 2001, and magistrate judge’s report and recommendation dated Mar. 5, 2003, and order dated Mar. 17, 2003. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Potter v. Nationwide Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., No. CA-00-63AMD (D.Md. March 28, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED This court has limited its review to the issues discussed in Appellants’ informal briefs. See 4th Cir. Rule 34(b).