Douglas FAUCONIER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. E.M. SHRINER, C.O. II; Groves, C.O. Lieutenant; Stolmeyer, C.O. Captain; Coulter, C.O. Lieutenant, Defendants-Appellees, 184 F. App'x 323

PER CURIAM: Douglas Fauconier appeals the district court’s order granting

summary judgment to Defendants and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Fauconier v. Shriner, No. CA-05-149-RDB (D. Md. filed Aug. 2, 2005; entered Aug. 3, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED.