Source: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date: 2006-07-31
Jurisdiction: United States
Docket: No. 06-6726
Citation: 192 F. App'x 187
Opinion
PER CURIAM: Andre Kebe petitions for writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. He seeks release from imprisonment based on the delay. After Kebe filed the instant mandamus petition, the district court ruled on his § 2255 motion. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. The motion for appointment of counsel is denied. PETITION DENIED.