Reginald ASKEW, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Doctor LIGHTSEY, Defendant-Appellee, and Marvin L. Polk; V. McCullough; Michael V. Norris; D.J. Metiko, Doctor, Defendants, 205 F. App'x 174

PER CURIAM: Reginald Askew appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See As kew v. Polk, No. 5:05-ct-00022-H (E.D.N.C. Feb. 27, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED.