Source: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date: 2007-04-30
Jurisdiction: United States
Docket: No. 07-6217
Citation: 225 F. App'x 173
Opinion
PER CURIAM: Dejuan Anderko Watkins petitions for a writ of mandamus claiming there was undue delay by the district court in disposing of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The Government filed a response noting that the district court entered a judgment and order denying the § 2255 motion. In light of the court’s action, we deny as moot Watkins’ petition for a writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED.