Daniel PETERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lieutenant Ms. JAMES; Sergeant Ms. Richardson, at Nash Correctional Institution; Charles Hill, at Nash Correctional Institution; Captain Tuck, at Nash Correctional Institution, Defendants-Appellees, 232 F. App'x 363

PER CURIAM: Daniel Peterson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Peterson v. James, No. 5:05-ct-00501-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 15, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED.