Source: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date: 2007-08-29
Jurisdiction: United States
Docket: No. 07-6169
Citation: 238 F. App'x 968
Opinion
PER CURIAM: Danny Eugene Meshaw petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed in acting on his motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). Meshaw seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the record indicates that the district court denied Meshaw’s § 2255 motion by order dated June 19, 2007. See Meshaw v. United States, Nos. 7:04-cr-00061-F-3; 7:06-cv-00006-F (E.D.N.C. June 18, 2007). Accordingly, because the district court has acted in Meshaw’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED.