Source: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date: 2007-09-17
Jurisdiction: United States
Docket: No. 07-7135
Citation: 241 F. App'x 966
Opinion
PER CURIAM: Allan Michael Rudd petitions for a writ of mandamus alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We find there has been no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED.