Orlando Rapheal CLARK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ernest R. SUTTON; Curtis E. Brown, Defendants-Appellees, 251 F. App'x 165

PER CURIAM: Orlando Rapheal Clark appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Clark v. Sutton, No. 5:05-ct-00724-H (E.D.N.C. Feb. 2, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED.