Sylvester CRUDUP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. K. SUTTON, c/o, Personal Property Officer; M. Buckles, c/o, Personal Property Officer; S. Hughes, Institution Ombudsman; Alton Baskerville, Warden; W.P. Rogers, Regional Director, Defendants-Appellees, 30 F. App'x 188

PER CURIAM. Sylvester Crudup appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Crudup v. Sutton, No. CA-00-363-2 (E.D. Va. May 24, 2000 & Sept. 6, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED. Because Crudup fails to challenge in his informal brief the district court’s order granting

summary judgment to Defendants on the denial of access to courts claim, this issue is not preserved for appeal. 4th Cir. Local R. 34(b).