UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony Earl ROSS, a/k/a Bam, Defendant-Appellant, 320 F. App'x 167

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Anthony Earl Ross appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Ross, No. 3:02-cr-00336-RLW-1 (E.D.Va. Aug. 21, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED.