UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Kennita HOWARD, a/k/a Eyez, Defendant - Appellant, 323 F. App'x 281

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Kennita Howard appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Howard, No. 1:06-cr-00106-IMK-JSK-l (N.D.W.Va. Mar. 3, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED.