UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Edward JONES, Jr., a/k/a Liddy, Defendant-Appellant, 324 F. App'x 215

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: John Edward Jones, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to amend his criminal judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Jones, No. 1:98-cr-00048-WMN-1 (D.Md. Aug. 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED.