Edward Lee MOSES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M. BLOCHER; Michael Hardee; Hugh Martin, Jr.; Hattie B. Pimpong, Defendants-Appellees, 326 F. App'x 227

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Edward Lee Moses appeals the district court’s order and judgment granting the Appellees’ motion to dismiss and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Moses v. Blocker, No. 5:07-ct-03070-D (E.D.N.C. Jan. 16, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED.