UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cearful SPEIGHT, a/k/a June, Defendant-Appellant, 328 F. App'x 233

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Cearful Speight appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Speight, No. 2:93-cr-00090-RBS-7 (E.D.Va. Sept. 19, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. ' AFFIRMED.