George Paul LAROQUE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Theodis BECK; James E. Langston; Theodore Walker; Heidi Galetschry, Defendants-Appellees, 328 F. App'x 257

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: George Paul LaRoque' appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. LaRoque v. Beck, No. 5:09-ct-03025-H. (E.D.N.C. Mar. 3, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED.