UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Scott ELLIS, Defendant-Appellant, 33 F. App'x 150

PER CURIAM. Robert Scott Ellis appeals the district court’s order sentencing him to twenty-four months incarceration for violating the terms and conditions of his supervised release. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Supervised release is considered distinct from incarceration and is available in addition to the maximum term of imprisonment. See United States v. Pierce, 75 F.3d 173, 178 (4th Cir.1996).

Thus, upon revocation of supervised release, the imposition of a term of incarceration is permissible even if the resulting sentence, combined with the sentence already served, exceeds the maximum sentence allowed for the substantive offense. See, e.g., United States v. Robinson, 62 F.3d 1282, 1284-86 (10th Cir.1995). Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Ellis, No. CR-91-286 (S.D.W.Va. July 25, 2001).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED.