James ARBOGAST, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee, 35 F.2d 1015

PER CURIAM. After a careful consideration of the record herein, we do not think that any of the assignments of error has sufficient merit to justify discussion. The question in the case was a question of fact, which has been resolved against defendant by the jury. There- was no error in the rulings of the court, and its judgment will accordingly be affirmed. Affirmed.