James R. FINCHAM, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Howard PAINTER, Warden, Respondent-Appellee, 36 F. App'x 160

PER CURIAM. James R. Fincham seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Fincham v. Painter, No. CA-00-55 (N.D.W.Va. Feb. 27, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED.