UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rodney Edward WALL, a/k/a Sid Dft 3:99-24-9, a/k/a Big Rodney, Defendant-Appellant, 366 F. App'x 470

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Rodney Edward Wall appeals the district court’s order denying Wall’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Wall, No. 3:99-cr-00024-FDW-9 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 31, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED.