UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos WOODS, Defendant-Appellant, 387 F. App'x 332

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: . Carlos Woods appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed.R.Crim.P. 33 motion for a new trial. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Woods, No. 1:07-cr-00127-WDQ-1 (D.Md. Feb. 19, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED.