Marie Therese ASSA'AD-FALTAS, MD, MPH, for herself and those similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE SOUTH CAROLINA SUPREME COURT, solely in its legislative capacity; and solely for injunctive relief; Charles Austin, in his official capacity as City Manager for the City of Columbia ["the City" or "Columbia"]; Robert C. Coble, in his official capacity as Mayor for the City of Columbia, SC; Officer Sellers, in his official capacity as a police officer for Columbia; Officer Gordon, in his official capacity as a police officer for Columbia; Officer Dietz, in his official capacity as a police officer for Columbia; Officer Beddingfield, in his official capacity as a police officer for Columbia; Officer Anderson, in his official capacity as a police officer for Columbia; Gwendolyn Bouie, in her official capacity as Assistant Attorney for the City; Christa Bell, in her official capacity as Assistant Attorney for the City; Overture Walker, in his official capacity as Assistant Attorney for the City; Tameka Isaacs Devine, in her official capacity as member of City Council for the City of Columbia, SC and the other Council members in that capacity; James Meggs, in his official capacity as City Attorney for the City; Kenneth Gaines, in his official capacity as City Attorney for the City; Dana M. Thye, individually and officially as Assistant Attorney for the City; Robert G. Cooper, individually and officially as Assistant Attorney for the City; Unknown Named Agents for the City, in their respective official capacities, Defendants-Appellees, 391 F. App'x 258

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Marie Therese Assa’ad-Faltas, M.D., M.P.H., appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to summarily dismiss her complaint, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (2006), as well as its order denying her Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(

e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Assa’ad-Faltas’s motions for appointment of counsel and to place the appeal in abeyance and affirm the district court’s orders. See Assa’ad-Faltas v. South Carolina Supreme Court, No. 3:09-cv-00507-TLW (D.S.C. filed July 22, 2009, entered July 23, 2009; Aug. 24, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED.