UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gerome Montreal RANDALL, Defendant-Appellant, 42 F. App'x 625

PER CURIAM: Gerome Montreal Randall seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting the Government’s motion to dismiss his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2002) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal substantially on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Randall, Nos. CR-95-58; CA-00-200-4-H (E.D.N.C. Apr. 3, 2001).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED. Randall’s due process claim is meritless because he cannot establish his rights were violated by the jury's use of a general verdict to convict him of drag crimes involving only one type of controlled substance.