UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Malcolm MALIK, Defendant-Appellant, 43 F. App'x 621

PER CURIAM. Malcolm Malik seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Malik, Nos. CR-96-15-V; CA-00-191-5 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 28, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED.