Lynn Ellen MENDES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles BROWN; Charlotte Mecklenburg Public Library, Defendants-Appellees, 465 F. App'x 232

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Lynn Ellen Mendes appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006), and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mendes v. Brown, No. 3:10-cv-00397-RLV-DCK (W.D.N.C. Nov. 19, 2010; Aug. 29, 2011).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED.