UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Peter SIMPSON, a/k/a Peter Pillings, a/k/a Clarence Floyd, a/k/a Diamond, Defendant-Appellant, 474 F. App'x 245

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Peter Simpson appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Simpson, No. 1:95-cr-00005-IMK-1 (N.D.W.Va. Feb. 17, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED.