Daniel Johnson WILLIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Lionel Meadows; Albert L. Meadows; Furney Mundine; Albert H. Brown; Dora Miller; Bayron Green; Lena Brown; Ernestine Brown; Anita B. Brown; Hannah C. Gray; Nelson Dove; Debra Cureton; Phyllis Brown, Plaintiffs, v. TOWN OF TRENTON, North Carolina; Joffree T. Leggett, Former Mayor of the Town of Trenton, North Carolina; Edward Eubanks; Willard O. Lewis; Charles Jones, Councilmen of the Town of Trenton, North Carolina; C. Glenn Spivey, Town Clerk; McDavid And Associates; Richard Moore, Engineer for the Town of Trenton, North Carolina; Mayor and Council of Trenton, North Carolina; Sylvia A. Willis; Jones County Board of Elections; Richard C. Tyndall, Jr.; James M. Bender, Jr.; Will H. Brock; Gail Lee, and their successors; Susan Camaret, Secretary, Board of Elections; Michael Jenkins, member, Board of Elections and/or their successors; Veterans Administrator for the County of Jones; Jones County, North Carolina, Defendants-Appellees, and State of North Carolina, and its entities; Bill Meyers, Director, North Carolina Department of Environmental Health and Natural Resources; Dexter Matthews, Chief, Division of Solid Waste; J. Bobby Blowe, Chief, Construction Grants; James C. Kearney, Director, Rural Economic and Community Development; John H. Hankinson, Jr., Director, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region IV; Mario Machado, Chief, Construction Grants, their successors and agents; Edwin W. Causey, as Rural Development Manager; Willard R. Dean, as Director of Business and Utilities Division; Janet Reno, Attorney General of the United States; Janice M. Cole, Defendants, 50 F. App'x 648

PER CURIAM. Daniel Johnson Willis appeals the district court’s order entering a pre-filing injunction against him. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Willis v. Town of Trenton, Nos. CA-96-6-4; CA-99-116-4; CA-01-13 — 4; CA 01-133-4; CA-01-159-4 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 5, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED.