UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Alonza RUFUS, Defendant-Appellant, 518 F. App'x 168

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Michael Alonza Rufus appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a writ of error coram nobis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Rufus, No. 3:02-cr-00550-MBS-1 (D.S.C. Dec. 11, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED.