Daniel H. KING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Attorney General Eric HOLDER; Kathleen Sibelius; Charles E. Samuels, Jr.; Justin Andrews, Defendants-Appellees, 591 F. App'x 204

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Daniel H. King appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. King v. Holder, No. 5:13-ct-03179-FL, 2014 WL 4701924 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 22, 2014).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED.