Kenneth Valentine AWE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. George HINKLE, VDOC Regional Administrator; Rosp Warden Mathena, Warden; Rosp Ass/Warden Walrath, A/Warden, Defendants-Appellees, 593 F. App'x 242

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Kenneth V. Awe appeals the district court’s order granting

summary judgment in favor of the defendants in Awe’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Awe’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Awe has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED.