Harley David CROSBY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY; South Carolina Highway Patrol; James C. Filyaw, Defendants-Appellees, 691 F. App'x 783

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Harley David Crosby appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) claim and remanding the remaining claims to the state court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Crosby v. South Carolina Dep’t of Pub. Safety, 2:15-cv-01455-RMG, 2017 WL 398352 (D.S.C. Jan. 30, 2017).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED