Source: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date: 2017-08-28
Jurisdiction: United States
Docket: No. 17-1616
Citation: 696 F. App'x 647
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Curtis Richardson petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED